Wednesday, October 15, 2014

Lucy Rosenbloom - Reflection Paper #2

York: The Author of Fear on an Expedition for Freedom

Fear is a theme that has been present throughout much of history.  Fear is one reason why countries wage war, make allies, and sign treaties.  Countries are fearful of loss of life, loss of power, loss of money, and much more.  In the United States during the late eighteenth and throughout the nineteenth centuries, one of man’s fears was related to power.  Through poetry, Frank X Walker is able to bring to life the story of York, while showing how the industry of slavery was designed on the concept of fear.  Although a work of fiction, the poems in Buffalo Dance: The Journey of York, accurately explain the tensions of slavery and the struggle for power at the time.
It is important to differentiate between a soldier and a slave.  The poem “At Ease” provides many parallels between these two occupations.  Walker describes how, “the sergeants walked the men back an forth every day.” This is similar to slaves being brought above deck and forced to exercise during the voyage from Africa to America.  This form of exercise was intended to reduce the risk of illness and complications among slaves. Another parallel between soldiers and slaves highlighted in Walker’s poetry is the idea of a spectacle. Walker uses York’s voice to convey how, “The privates was made to stand as stiff as oaks / an dance together in straight lines with no music / while they carried they long riffles / like it a parade for the squirrels at the snow.” In the eyes of York, this strange action was comparable to the public ridicule masters often inflicted among their slaves when in need of entertainment.  Lastly, Walker relates the images of scars from slaves being whipped to the punishment disobedient soldiers received.  Walker portrays York as an empathetic character who finds similarities with the soldier.  Although Walker points out many similarities between soldiers and slaves, he leaves out one significant difference.  Soldiers fight for an end result, while slaves fight simply to survive.  While soldiers do not always go into battle willingly, they realize that the end result of their service will benefit them in some way.  Slaves, on the other hand, did not voluntarily submit themselves to slavery, and never saw any greater reward for themselves or their families.
One justification often made for the violence inflicted on slaves, was the fear of revolt.  Masters needed to assert their dominance from the beginning in order to make slaves fearful of the consequences of disobedience.  Slaves only had two choices, to remain a slave or to attempt to flee.  The goal of the master was to make the slave submissive due to fear of physical violence.  Masters also had control over their slaves when it came to family.  Slaves could easily be bought and sold, often tearing them apart from their loved ones.  Admitting and giving into the notion of fear was one way for slaves to cope with their position within the unfair system of slavery.
Slavery was exhausting, both physically and mentally.  In order to deal with this exhaustion, slaves needed to be fearful of their masters. However, this is not how Walker describes York.  York was scared of no one and nothing.  The role of fear seemed to switch during the Lewis and Clark expedition.  For example, Walker’s depiction of the Mandan village shows how the white men were fearful of the uncharted land.  Forcing York and Sacagawea to lead the men through the forest in “Leading Men” emphasizes this fear of the unknown that the white man had.  By using York and Sacagawea as a sort of sacrificial lamb, Lewis and Clark were able to continue their expedition while still asserting their dominance.  This concept of the unknown can be depicted in many ways.  A similar unknown was the emancipation of slavery.  A world without slavery was as scary for Lewis and Clark to imagine as, “mistaking tree roots for rattlers an wasting / precious ball an powder on shadows an the wind.” Without instilling a sense of fear in their slaves, the white man feared what would happen if slavery were to be abolished.
While white men feared what life would be like in the New World without slavery, slaves feared what their lives would become if slavery continued.  Walker expressed death as a dream for slaves.  Similarly to the grizzly bear, slaves are not afraid of death, but rather, “that when he wakes up / he’ll just be a slave again.” Slavery was not just an institution that affected a single generation. Instead, it perpetuated a cycle of dehumanization that had no end in sight.  

In present day, fear is often seen as something that can be overcome.  However, during the time of slavery, fear was used as an important tool, which became part of the foundation for the system.  It was important that both the master and the slave possessed some form of fear, in order for the institution of slavery to continue.  Masters used fear of physical violence and separation to force their slaves into obedience.  However, Walker describes how the only thing worth fearing was slavery itself.  Through the fictional poetry written by Walker, new insight into the master/slave relationship is revealed.

Evan Cuccia - Reaction Paper #2


Evan Cuccia

Reaction Paper #2

 

            As slavery took hold in America, those who fell victim to the harsh institution faced a challenge. Seeing as slavery was woven into the very foundation of the United States, the enslaved could either accept their fate or fight to change it. Through an examination of the recent class material, one can gain a more clear understanding of slavery’s place in American society and the ways slaves persevered in light of that.

            The selected readings from Slavery’s Constiution, reveal how deeply the institution of slavery was engrained in American culture in the late 1700s and what little action was being taken to bring an end to it. In the Prologue of Slavery’s Constitution, titled “Meaningful Silences,” the author discusses the original Constitution and the ways it slyly bolstered slavery in the United States. The chapter explains that while the esteemed document never explicitly mentioned slavery, “the framers and their constituents created fundamental laws that sustained human bondage.”[1] For instance, Article I featured the Three-Fifths Compromise, which indirectly stated that slaves would be counted as three-fifths of a whole free person in state population calculations.[2] Not only did the Compromise serve as proof that slaves were not considered fully human, but it encouraged slavery. By allowing state governments to include slaves in the total number that would determine taxation and representation, the Constitution paved the way for an increase in the number bodies owned. The Constitution opened doors for slaves states again in Article IV, with the inclusion of the Full Faith and Credit Doctrine. Under this clause, all runaway slaves were to be considered criminals and returned to the state from which they fled, giving the states full power over their slaves.[3] Through an analysis of the Constitution, one can see that slavery was very carefully placed just below the surface of the document.[4] Without ever using the word “slavery” or “slave,” Madison wrote extensively on the subject all throughout the Constitution, and this becomes clear in Slavery’s Constitution.[5] The Chapter concludes, that it was with “silence, compromise, and artful design” that the framers turned a blind eye to the issue of slavery.[6] With the country’s most coveted document failing to mention the problem, slavery carried on as usual. In conjunction with Slavery’s Constitution, the remaining sources paint a picture of what the slaves chose to do in response.

            As the institution pushed on, some slaves began to stand their ground. By the late eighteenth century, slaves were running away, staging rebellions, appealing to religious ideals, writing petitions, and even joining the army in return for their freedom.[7] An example of this can be found in the African American Voices reading, specifically in the petition written by the slaves of Fairfield County, Connecticut. The petition, addressed to the assembly in 1779, argued that slavery was fundamentally unjust and should be removed from the state.[8] The author of the document asserts that slaves, like their white masters, are children of God and thus, deserve equal freedoms.[9] The slave then goes on to ask: “Can your Honours any longer Suffer, this great Evil to prevail, under your Government?” While the slave’s plea seems convincing to a modern audience, it was quickly shot down by both houses. When attempts such as this were ignored, some slaves turned to a more pro-active approach. For example, Document 19 of the African American Voices excerpt, tells of a slave revolt planned by Solomon’s brother, Gabriel, against the white slave-holders of Virginia.[10] Via this source, one can see the different efforts slaves were making in order to obtain their freedom. While a number of them were able to escape, whether it be through abolition or revolt, many were left with no choice but to cope with their bondage.

            Those who remained enslaved, recognized that holding onto their humanity would be necessary for survival. With this, came the birth of the Afro-American culture and the rise of a hybrid, slave religion. Chapter Four of Major Problems shows that culture fostered a sense of community among the enslaved peoples. By incorporating their African pasts into their American lives, they created a slave specific culture that provided them with family ties and a set of common beliefs.[11] The African American Christianity chapter explains that religion was a major facet of this slave culture. The source describes the evolution of a religion that combined Christian practices and traditional African beliefs. For instance, their meetings would serve as a time for gathering and worshiping as in the Christian Church, but also as a place for dancing and singing, which was a typically African characteristic.[12] By bonding elements of Africa and America to create a culture and subsequently, a religion, the slaves were able to establish an identity for themselves outside of slavery.

            It is in Buffalo Dance that readers can see these aspects of slavery come alive. Through York’s account of the Lewis and Clark voyage, one can gain useful insight into the slave experience. By bringing York’s voice to the forefront, the book inserts slavery into an iconic tale, raising the question: If York was present for one of the most significant journeys in American history, why is he rarely mentioned?[13] Like the framers of the Constitution, Lewis and Clark felt no need to mention slaves, instead, it is York’s poems that situate him in this particular moment in history. In “Cold Hearted,” York contemplates his lesser than status. Pointing out that while his master was dressed in “warm stockings/long underwear, army boots/an coat a fur,” he had “walked holes in [his] shoes” and was beginning to “come down with the frost/on [his] feets an [privates].”[14] Like other slaves, York yearned for his freedom, imagining it to “be like having a whole sky to yourself,” but he knew that even running away would not save him from the shackles.[15] In “Electorate,” York explains that even when he was awarded a vote, he was not equal to the white men.[16] While York acknowledges the struggles of being a slave, it is clear that he never turns over his humanity to the institution, seeing as the book is riddled with talk of women, religion, love, and black identity.[17] In “Cumulonimbus,” York exclaims: “it take something African/to stand in the rain an smile/while it storming all ‘round.”[18] A quote that in sum, exemplifies the resistance of the slaves to ever fully surrender themselves to the institution.

            Together, these sources serve as a testament to the resilience of the slave population. Regardless of how much society ignored the problem, the slaves made their presence known. The sources demonstrate that by submitting petitions, organizing rebellions, and banding together as a cohesive group, the slaves brought the issue out of the dark and into the public eye. Moreover, the readings show that in building a communal culture, the slaves expressed their willingness not only to survive, but to grow. It is with this knowledge, that one can begin to piece together the complex topic that is slavery in the United States.



[1] David Waldstreicher, Slavery’s Constitution: From Revolution to Ratification (New York: Hill and Wang, 2009), 3.
[2] Waldstreicher, Slavery’s Constitution, 4.
[3] Waldstreicher, Slavery’s Constitution, 8.
[4] Charles McKinney, “Slavery in America,” (Lecture, Rhodes College, Memphis, TN, October 2, 2014).
[5] Ibid.
[6] Waldstreicher, Slavery’s Constitution, 19.
[7] Charles McKinney, “Slavery in America,” (Lecture, Rhodes College, Memphis, TN, October 2, 2014).
[8] Steve Mintz, African American Voices: The Life Cycle of Slavery (New York: Brandywine Press, 2004), 89.
[9] Mintz, African American Voices, 90.
[10] Mintz, African American Voices, 94.
[11] Charles McKinney, “African American Culture,” (Lecture, Rhodes College, Memphis, TN, October 7, 2014).
[12] Paul Johnson, editor, African American Christianity: Essays in History (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994), 31.
[13] Charles McKinney, “Buffalo Dance,” (Lecture, Rhodes College, Memphis, TN, October 14, 2014).
[14] Frank X Walker, Buffalo Dance: The Journey of York (Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 2004), 49.
[15] Walker, Buffalo Dance, 50.
[16] Walker, Buffalo Dance, 52.
[17] McKinney, “Buffalo Dance.”
[18] Walker, Buffalo Dance, 65.

Jasmin Keller - Reaction Paper 2

Jasmin Keller
Reaction Paper 2
10/15/14
History 205 – Slavery in the United States
keljc-17@rhodes.edu

           
            Although slavery is deeply woven into the fabric of American society, it remained (and to a certain extent still remains) mostly invisible. In fact, the American economy was based on slavery. Or to put it in other words: slavery lay the foundation for the economy. It did so in various ways: first of all, slaves served as basic commodities that could be acquired and then sold as other goods on the market. Secondly, as a result of the commodification of slaves they were seen as property. Since wealth is measured in property, slaves contributed to the status of the masters. Finally, slaves were not only regarded as commodities but produced other commodities, such as tobacco, sugar and cotton, themselves. To preserve the status quo, it was only natural that the voice of slaves were silenced, especially because the majority of the population benefitted from the situation.
            In terms of the legal situation, slavery was never mentioned explicitly in the Constitution. Yet the institution of slavery heavily shaped the document and can be found all over it. Eleven of the total eighty-four clauses deal with the issue of slavery . How deeply rooted slavery is in the Constitution becomes obvious upon taking a closer look at the central themes of taxation and representation. “No taxation without representation” had been the key statement of the revolutionary war and the reason why it was fought in the first place. Both taxation as well as representation are connected to the population, but in a certain way.
            “Representation and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.”
           
As free persons, servants and apprentices, and Indians were already mentioned in this passage, “all other persons” refers to slaves. David Waldstreicher points out that, contrary to common belief, “Africans and their descendants were not being defined as three-fifths of a person,…rather their presence was acknowledged as a source of power and of wealth, for their owners. This again, emphasizes the aforementioned point, slaves were seen as property and benefitted their masters in terms of wealth. The Constitution clearly favored those who owned other people. Taxation and representation was connected to slavery. This is only one example of how slavery influenced the Constitution. Only by taking a closer look at the document, and by analyzing it, it becomes clear that slavery is in fact everywhere. But as it is never directly mentioned, it remains invisible at first glance.
Slaves’ contributions to certain historical events are barely mentioned. One example is a slave named York who belonged to William Clark and accompanied his master on the Lewis and Clark expedition. Literature that deals with the expedition left out York’s role in it. Frank X Walter book “Buffalo Dance – The Journey of York” is quite successful in painting a powerful pictures of York’s experiences and in giving him a voice that had been silenced by history. Slaves were not allowed to receive a proper education, “the only book we ‘lowed to know is the bible, though many a slave been sold south, had fingers chopped off an worse for the crime a reading an writing. As a result, many people, including scholars such as Thomas Jefferson thought slaves to be inferior to the settlers, “them think all slaves dumb ‘cause we can’t cipher, but they be surprised how many words we pick up just standing round like trees in a room full of “edjacated” men.”.

Slaves were made invisible by denying them the opportunity to document and share their experience with other citizens and history in the long term. Nowadays, when we look back at the revolutionary era, we immediately think of the great founding fathers and how they fought for freedom. It then becomes quite paradox, from today’s perspective, that a society which greatest accomplishment was breaking free from a tyranny, was built on slavery and the unfreedom of other people. Even more perplexing is that even today, the topic of slavery is not dealt with in depth. Most of the time we don’t perceive slaves as individual subjects, but look at slavery as one unfortunate event in history. While the institution of slavery does not remain invisible (as it is simply not possible), the fate and stories of individual slaves do.


Kirsten Samuels #2 Reaction Paper

Kirsten Samuels
16 October 2014
History 205
Cultural Assimilation
            Over the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, millions of Africans were taken from their homelands and transformed into commodities by the institution of slavery.  They were isolated from their traditional culture and ideas, and enslaved in a strange, foreign land.  Despite this harsh reality, slaves were able to conserve some of their beliefs and traditions.  They formed new identities through cultural assimilation, which often embodied similar customs from their backgrounds.  New slave culture aspects included religion, music and dancing, social aspects and familial dynamics; yet, this cultural assimilation also brought with it a threat to traditional American culture. 
In attempts to assimilate into the culture of their masters, they were able to merge some African religious customs while also integrating Christianity into a new religion, “The particular combination of Christian and pre-Christian religion that coexisted in the slave quarters originated, of course, in the contact and interaction of African and European cultures and was one component of the new, African-American culture that resulted from the enslavement of blacks in America.”[1]  Masters attempted to use Christianity as a way to force their slaves into submission, but the slaves were able to see the irony in using Christianity to defend the institution of slavery.[2]  The Christian idea of being equals before God completely discredited the practice of slavery. Under what was known as the “invisible church”, slaves were able to secretly practice their own form of Christianity without being scolded or preached at by their masters.  This formation of a new theology was able to bring Africans together, give them hope and create a distraction from the cruel experience of life under bondage. 
            Enslaved Africans were able to express themselves through music and dance.  This could have been used a method of distraction and as a way of holding on to pieces of their past, “They think we just happy to do the work but singing songs an laughing a little somehow makes the load lighter an keeps the bitter taste from crawling out our throats an sitting on our tongues ready to strike.”[3] Singing and dancing reflected on African rituals and oral traditions.  Clapping, dancing and playing instruments such as the banjo led to the formation of a new African American culture.  What people do not recognize is that this slave music laid the foundation for the huge, future movements of jazz and blues.  The music was incorporated into the slaves’ new form of religion, used as a way to connect with God.  Slaves also took part in song while in the fields.[4]  Anything that offered a distraction from their grueling workload was taken part in. 
            To survive and assimilate in America, slaves created family and social ties.  After the separation of families following the journey across the Atlantic, slaves provided hope for each other by forming extended families and social networks.  Familial and social ties provided a sense of community and unity within the desolate institution of slavery, “I try to keep every word I hear alive in my head so I can carry them back, an warm the fires at home.  I thinks my people will ‘preciate stories where whoever struggle in the beginning make out alright in the end.”[5]  Parents attempted to teach their children values of life, despite the societal norms that might contradict these lessons.  They were taught to believe that they were worth more than their worth as slaves.[6]  They taught them to act with etiquette and deference, no matter the situation.  The politics of deference were that, despite one’s age, slaves were subordinate to all white people.[7]  Male slaves were referred to as boy, while females were referred to as auntie.  This degrading reality enforced the superiority of the master and his family over their slaves.  Both the familial and social ties molded by slaves provided a sense of normalcy to their daily lives.    
            With all of this change and hope created by the spread of a new culture between slaves, masters became worried.  Hope led to a sense of confidence and possible resistance from slaves, things that could be detrimental to the institution of slavery.  The creation of a new slave culture had a completely oppositional relationship with the idea of the traditional American culture.[8]  Unity between slaves gave them strength to start questioning the morality and fairness of slave society.  The constitution stated that all people are created equal, so slaves started questioning why the document that founded our country and discredited slavery was not being taken seriously in that respect.  Communal strength gave slaves the opportunity to finally start taking their lives and futures into their own hands. 
With a new life as a slave in a foreign land, Africans needed to find a way to assimilate and survive.  They did this by creating their own culture within American, while also tying in influences from their previous cultures and traditions.  Religion, music and social dynamic each highly contributed to the brand new African American culture.  Resistance accompanied new slave culture, yet slaves finally began to control some aspects of their own lives.

Myles Darby
Professor McKinney
October 13th, 2014

                                                           Discussion Paper #2

              The major themes of the material from Major Problems in African-American History,Slavery’s Constitution, and Major Problems in African-American History are the rebuilding of the African American community and culture, how slavery shaped the American economy, and the role Christianity played in the lives of the slaves, and how it affected them. 
               African American Voices is particularly interesting because it is one of the first accounts we have read where a slave is describing how slavery has impacted his life, and the cruel reality it entails. It is also interesting how he describes slaves as being “rendered incapable of shewing [their] obedience to Almighty God”, because of the circumstances they are in. Masters attempted to “throw” their religion(Christianity), onto the slaves, and also tried to justify slavery from texts in the Bible. How are they to believe in a God, if this is what he has done to them, and is also what their slave masters are attempting to teach them? Why would anyone want to learn the religion practiced by their masters? Mintz asks these profound questions without giving any answers, which allows the reader to deeply ponder them, and puts us in the mind of a slave, even if it is for a couple of seconds. He is showing the huge amount of paradox not only the masters have, but also the society as a whole. “How can the master be said to Beare me Burden when he Beares me down with the Have chanes of slavery and operson against my will”. How are they expected to believe and trust in this religion, when the teachers of it are those who “unjustly dragged [them] by the cruel hand of power from [their] dearest friends and sum of [them] stolen from the bosoms of [their] tender parents and from a populous pleasant and plentiful country and brought hither to be made slaves for life in a Christian land”. Because they have been taken away from everything and everyone they love, he feels as though they are “deprived of every thing that hath a tendency to make life even more tolerable”. To make matters even worse, their “children are also taken from [them] by force and sent many miles away “, and will probably never see them again. Not only did slaves not want to convert to Christianity, they wanted to be as far away from it as possible. He asks the great question of “how can [they] fulfill [their] parte of duty to him whilst in this situation”, which “ironically”, nobody has the answer for. 
             Is it by chance that the word slavery is not mentioned in the constitution? I believe this is not a coincidence because the idea of slavery is all throughout the constitution, even if the actual word is never mentioned. Ironically, out of the eighty-four clauses, “six are directly concerned with slaves and their owners”, “while five others had implications for slavery that were considered and debated by the delegates to the 1787 Constitutional Convention and the citizens of the states during ratification”. The Constitution refers to slaves as “other persons”, but it is extremely obvious they are referring to slaves because they identify all other types of people. The three-fifths clause was one of the first extremely monumental differences that slavery had a great impact on. Instead of being counted as a whole person, slaves were counted as three-fifths of a person, which would “count toward a state’s number of congressmen, and would count towards how much in taxes a state would have to pay when the Congress passed a direct tax”. Because of this, the states who had more slaves were more powerful, and were able to put more representatives in the house. One of the most profound and thought provoking statements from Slavery’s Constitution is that “taxation with representation and slavery were joined at the hip”. Some slaveowners and people in power were not blind to the fact that the institution of slavery was extremely wrong, but the influence and money it brought were too much to abolish it. They wanted the best of both worlds. Slaveowners “wanted the wealth and power that slavery and its governance brought without the moral responsibility that… they also knew came with slavery”. It is very interesting that “President Washington decided that slavery was wrong yet felt bound by the Constitution to do nothing about it captures the main effects that the Constitution had on slavery and American politics”. This perfectly describes the relationship slavery had dealing with the American economy and society as a whole. Everyone knew slavery was morally wrong, but if even our first President, one of our founding fathers was not willing to do anything about it, then why should anyone else be concerned about it? If he was able to go against the grain, step out of the norm, relinquish his own slaves during his lifetime, one has to question how this would have switched American history. 

                How does a race of people somehow resurrect, or in some cases, create an entirely new culture, once everything has been taken from them? Their home was taken, food, religion, and even their family members. On top of all of this being taken, they were forced to move thousands of miles away to a land they had no idea about, and would spend the rest of their lives there. According to Holt and Brown, “all living cultures are influenced by social and historical developments; change and adaption is part of their nature”. They believe that Africans were bound to create a culture, since they are made to adapt. However, it was not as easy as they made it sound. Africans felt that they had to create a new culture out of “the necessity for change and adaptation” and it “was especially pertinent for the ethnically diverse African population in America”. In addition to the slaves being taken away from their homes, they were also thrown into a mixed population of numerous amounts of different tribes.Presumably, each group of people had a different set of cultures, which proved to be a problem in itself. If they were able to bring their culture across the ocean, how would all the different cultures mesh together. Would one certain culture prevail over another? Two things most of the slaves agreed on was the fact that they had to create “a language that made slaves intelligible to each other as well as to their masters, and the need to fashion a religion that made the harsh new world of slavery intelligible to themselves”. Because of this agreement, “change and continuity were but two sides of the same coin”.